Heat Equation
HEAT EQUATION
Consider a region that is open and a time variable , then we can define the heat equation:
Here, the unknown function represents the temperature distribution, where gives the temperature at position and time . The Laplacian operator acts on the spatial variables and is defined as:
The constant represents the thermal diffusivity of the medium, which measures how quickly heat spreads through the material.
The foolowing animations are taken from 3blue1brown's video "But what is a partial differential equation? | DE2"
Let's explore the heat equation in the one-dimensional case. Consider a function that represents the initial temperature distribution.
We study a thin metal rod of length and analyze how heat flows through it. Initially, the rod is heated non-uniformly, and at time , the temperature at position is . The function describes the temperature of the rod at position and time , with the initial condition:
Physical intuition tells us that over time, the rod should reach a uniform temperature distribution. We want to describe this behavior mathematically. For simplicity, let's consider three adjacent points with their temperatures at some time :
Let's investigate the temperature change over a small time interval relative to the temperatures at points and . The fundamental principle is that should approach the average of its neighboring points, , as the system moves toward thermal equilibrium. This can be approximated as:
The last term represents a finite difference approximation of the Laplacian operator .
While this explanation is not mathematically rigorous, it provides an intuitive understanding of the heat equation's behavior.
To visualize the evolution of temperature in our one-dimensional rod, we need to consider the heat equation with the given initial function . The temperature function requires a three-dimensional coordinate system for complete visualization, where:
- represents the position along the rod
- represents time
- gives the temperature at position and time
The foolowing material is taken from [EvansPDE2010] p. 46-47
Now, as we understand the idea behind the heat equation we want to find the solution to it. The key to solving the heat equation lies in understanding the fundamental solution . This remarkable function not only solves the heat equation itself but also enables us to construct solutions for any given initial distribution function .
FUNDAMENTAL SOLUTION
The function
is called the fundamental solution of the heat equation. Note that has a singularity at the point .
Using , we can construct solutions to the initial-value (or Cauchy) problem:
A key observation is that for any fixed and , both and solve the heat equation away from their respective singularities. This property suggests that we can construct a solution through convolution:
The fact that this convolution indeed provides a solution to our initial-value problem will be established in the subsequent theorem.
The foolowing material is taken from [EvansPDE2010] p. 47-48
Using the definition of the fundamental solution we can establish the following facts:
1. Regularity of the solution , i.e. the amount of derivatives.
2. Next, we verify that the convolution with indeed yields a solution to the heat equation.
3. Finally, despite the singularity of at , we will prove that our solution satisfies the initial condition by showing
for all .
SOLUTION OF INITIAL-VALUE PROBLEM
Assume (continuous and bounded), and define as above. Then
- ,
- ,
- .
Proof. 1. Since the function is infinitely differentiable, with uniformly bounded derivatives of all orders, on for each . As a consequence, our solution , obtained through convolution with this function, inherits these smoothness properties. Specifically:
This means our solution possesses continuous derivatives of all orders in both space and time variables, making it an extremely well-behaved function from an analytical perspective.
2. Let us now verify that our solution satisfies the heat equation. For each fixed , we know that solves the heat equation, meaning:
Using this property and the linearity of integration, we can show that solves the heat equation:
Thus, we have confirmed that our constructed solution is indeed a solution to the heat equation.
3. Let us now prove that our solution satisfies the initial condition by showing that as . Fix any and . Since is continuous, there exists such that
For , we can decompose the difference between and as follows:
For the first term , since is the density of a normal distribution with mean and variance :
For the second term , observe that when and :
This leads to
The final integral approaches zero as . Therefore, for sufficiently small and , we have:
So, the theorem is proved .
The foolowing material is taken from [EvansPDE2010] p. 51-54
DEFINITION
Assume is open and bounded region, and fix a time .
- We define the parabolic cylinder
- The parabolic boundary of is
We want next to derive a kind of analogue to the mean-value property for harmonic functions. There is no such simple formula. However let us observe that for fixed the spheres are level sets of the fundamental solution for Laplace's equation. This suggests that perhaps for fixed the level sets of fundamental solution for the heat equation may be relevant.
We write if has two continuous spatial derivatives and one continuous time derivative on .
MEAN-VALUE PROPERTY OF HEAT EQUATION
Let solve the heat equation. For fixed , , and , define
Then
for each .
Formula above is a sort of analogue for the heat equation of the mean-value formulas for Laplace's equation. Observe that the right-hand side involves only for times . This is reasonable, as the value should not depend upon future times.
Proof sketch. Shift the space and time coordinates so that and . Upon mollifying if necessary, we may assume is smooth. Write and set
We compute
To handle the term , we introduce a function that vanishes on :
and observe on , since on . We utilize to write
there is no boundary term since on . Integrating by parts with respect to , we discover
Consequently, since solves the heat equation,
Thus is constant, and therefore
where the last constant comes from the scaling identity
The direct computation of the integral over is routine but somewhat long, so we omit it here.
References
- [EvansPDE2010]Lawrence C. Evans. Partial Differential Equations, 2010.